am i prophetic ... not really

I was reading someone's blog that happened to link to an old post of mine from March 2006. In it I said,

I think the charge that "the postmodern preference for ambiguity and uncertainty is seriously at odds with Scripture" is unsubstantiated and frankly, the accusers seem to demonstrate a greater lack of understanding of the Gospel than the accused. It seems to me that both sides have a clear understanding of the Gospel and how to present it. One side seems a bit distracted from the task and prefers to play the role of watchdog. I've read and heard some great preaching from that group. I for one think they would really contribute to the Kingdom if they got back to that focus.

I was thinking that was interesting because:

• the pattern of attack by some on others hasn't changed over the years - only who they focus the attack on has changed. And when I say years, I'm thinking back to the days of Christ.
• the attackers tend to demonstrate as much error or more as they try to oppose the error of others
• in nowise is the Kingdom of God advanced in any of it

So that this doesn't trigger an off-topic debate, this is about truth warriors attacking others, not post-modernism nor emergents. I would now qualify my statement above regarding postmodernism with the hard versus soft postmodernism point.