Monday, May 24, 2010

christian socialism

I am not supportive of the new US health-care program. I do not like many government programs. Yet I'm not against all programs. In fact, part of me is open to some form of government health-care, just not the one that recently became law. But this isn't about that. This is about Christians claiming government programs are Christian. That I do not understand.

I recently had a short dialog with a friend who concluded "benevolence is benevolence." I don't agree and I look forward to grabbing some time with him to further explore his thinking (and vice-versa). To me, what some call benevolence I call socialism (among other things). John Aman writes on this topic.

Friedrich Engels [on] collectivism's clash with Christianity, "...if some few passages of the Bible may be favourable to Communism, the general spirit of its doctrines is, nevertheless, totally opposed to it ...."

 
Despite Engels and Marx (who dismissed religion as the "opium of the people"), ... many ... still manage to see socialism in the Bible. They point to the early church which, at first glance, seems like a model socialist community. The New Testament reports that these first believers "had all things in common" (Acts 4:32) and "all who were possessors of lands or houses sold them, and brought the proceeds of the things that were sold, and laid them at the apostles' feet; and they distributed to each as anyone had need" (Acts 4:34-35).

But unlike socialism, the sharing was voluntary, not coerced, and the money was given not to the state, but the church. As Southern Baptist leader Richard Land puts it ..., "It's one thing for you to give out of compassion to someone who's less fortunate. It's an entirely different thing for the government to confiscate your property and give it to someone else." ...

While the Bible asserts property rights and the rights of inheritance, socialism assaults them. Marx and Engels put the "abolition of property" first in a ten-step program for implementing communism. That's not exactly a Christian thing to do. The eighth commandment, "You shall not steal" (Exodus 20:15) applies every bit as much to the men and women who hold the reins of political power as it does to everyone else.

So does the 10th commandment, "You shall not covet" (Exodus 20:17). Coveting, or envy, is a powerful driver of socialism, which is in a perpetual snit that some people have more than others. So when President Obama castigates "Fats Cats" on Wall Street, decries "economic inequality," and warns, as he did in his 2009 budget statement that a "disproportionate share of the nation's wealth has been accumulated by the very wealthy," he stokes a destructive impulse that is condemned by Scripture.

Socialism also runs afoul of the first commandment, "You shall have no other gods before Me" (Exodus 20:3). Socialist governments seek to play God — to take His place as the ultimate sovereign. Consider the veneration that Russians once gave to the embalmed remains of Lenin and Stalin, the Nazi-prescribed prayer to Hitler ("Thy Reich [kingdom] comes, thy will alone is law upon the earth"), and the personality cult surrounding North Korea's "Dear Leader," Kim Jong-il.

The sixth commandment, "You shall not murder," is also widely ignored by Marxist regimes. Marx and Engels proclaimed that their aims could be "attained only by the forcible overthrow of all existing social conditions." Their disciples, Lenin, Stalin, Mao, Pol Pot, and other communist henchmen, killed 100-million people, a "tragedy of planetary dimensions," as the French publisher of The Black Book of Communism put it.

Barack Obama may say that the Bible tells him to be his brother's keeper (his youngest half-brother reportedly lived in a shack in Kenya on $1 a day at the time he said this), but he ought to go back and reread what God's Word actually says. Engels was right. Socialism has nothing in common with Scripture.

4 comments:

paul del signore said...

Good post. I often hear the same claim of 'distribution' which looks more like a form of legalism rather than grace.

Geoff said...

OK - there's a bunch here I'd agree with: I don't think that communism or socialism are any more "biblical" than capitalism is. But there is a paragraph here that is offensive:

"So does the 10th commandment, "You shall not covet" (Exodus 20:17). Coveting, or envy, is a powerful driver of socialism, which is in a perpetual snit that some people have more than others. So when President Obama castigates "Fats Cats" on Wall Street, decries "economic inequality," and warns, as he did in his 2009 budget statement that a "disproportionate share of the nation's wealth has been accumulated by the very wealthy," he stokes a destructive impulse that is condemned by Scripture.

Seriously? To comment that it's unsatisfactory for the rich to get richer is a breach of the 10th commandment? Rubbish. That's not the God I read about in the bible, and it's certainly not the God I serve. The God I serve is constantly on about how we treat the poor, and to suggest that comments like those quoted are sinful is offensive.

ricki said...

Geoff - agreed on capitalism in general. In particular when it is motivated by greed and at the cost of oppressing others I absolutely agree. In some forms I'm not sure it's wrong but that's a larger conversation.

I didn't take the Obama (and this isn't limited to him) point as folks getting richer being a breach of the commandment, I took the point being that "class envy" (a tool used by many) is a breach of the commandment. So if the author meant the former ("he stokes a destructive impulse"), again, I agree with you. If the latter, then not.

I have no issue with the rich and the poor. I have issue with how some rich get rich and how some rich use their/our wealth. Do you agree with this or are you thinking God is fundamentally against wealth?

Good clarifications ... thanks.

ricki said...

Geoff - PS, should I stop looking for your thoughts on that Arizona thing? I'm guessing it is too complicated for internet communication but I was serious, I'm conflicted on that one. I know that I disagree with the shouts of racism, nazism, etc., but I see other pros and cons so I wondered why you thought what you did.

Again, I'm ok if you say it's too complex to share via internet.

reftagger