tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-17886560.post5104006857586908434..comments2024-02-07T19:06:00.569-05:00Comments on Rick Ianniello: inerrancy means freedomrickihttp://www.blogger.com/profile/08761115460598252675noreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-17886560.post-41607162792760650002012-05-17T08:11:22.741-04:002012-05-17T08:11:22.741-04:00Again, fair enough.Again, fair enough.Rick Fruehhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05879848568892457571noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-17886560.post-12459245715087109432012-05-17T08:05:59.918-04:002012-05-17T08:05:59.918-04:00I didn't think I was being obsessive or had it...I didn't think I was being obsessive or had it as a focus. I do however find the 'doctrine' to be helpful, important, and most important, to be true. So I'm unclear why some feel a need to caution about abuse every time it is mentioned. It would be like dropping by someone else's blog and every time they mention the Church, Christ, whatever, remind them of the damage done in rickihttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08761115460598252675noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-17886560.post-23036323063897035282012-05-17T08:01:21.116-04:002012-05-17T08:01:21.116-04:00Inerrancy may be true, however the obsession, focu...Inerrancy may be true, however the obsession, focus, and doctrinal requirement is moot. Most missionaries have never relied upon that doctrine for their witness. There are no original documents, so not only must we assume our copies are overwhelmingly accurate, but we must assume they are inerrant? <br /><br />A commenter on your link said,<br /><br />“Well, if you (anyone) believes the Bible hasRick Fruehhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05879848568892457571noreply@blogger.com